Conclusion

OVERVIEW

In the last lesson, we looked at the Beatles. In this lesson, we will consider their counterparts in the British Invasion, the Rolling Stones. As we will see, the Rolling Stones had a very different trajectory than the Beatles did. They began as a blues cover band in London, and although their career exploded at about the same time as the Beatles', they far outlived their Fab Four counterparts as a group. Today, the members of the Rolling Stones are in their seventies and still going strong.

OBJECTIVES

Be ready to:

Recall the British blues revival tradition, which began as British musicians studied and emulated the music of Chicago blues musicians such as Howlin' Wolf and Muddy Waters

Recall the early days of the Rolling Stones and consider how their style changed as they moved from recording mostly covers of blues music to writing their own material

Identify the many ways in which the Rolling Stones were the opposite of the Beatles, apart from being a British rock band that was popular beginning in the middle of the 1960s

Rolling Stones

The Rolling Stones represent a different side of the British Invasion when compared to the Beatles. The Beatles were the suit-wearing Fab Four whose songs drew from Motown and Buddy Holly. The Rolling Stones were the scruffy, casually-dressed, and foul-mouthed group who started as a blues cover band and eventually became their own songwriters. Both groups have left a lasting legacy on rock and roll. In fact, the Rolling Stones continue to tour. In 2012 and 2013, the Stones toured the United States and Europe for what they called their 50 and Counting tour, in honor of the band's fiftieth anniversary.